Google

Creating change by raising awareness of causes that ensure a better future.

June 8, 2011

Sagittarius Horoscope for Woman.


Sagittarius: November 22nd - December 21st.
A Sagittarius woman lacks clock and their dwelling; on to statements can you for feeling like a running away from it form. Then she suddenly says so something that you believe, as if you are on the 7th sky. There you go again! They are again included in their charm. As soon as you become of a Sagittarius girl enamored, you with it for a long time to remain. It is pleasantly very, friendly, frankly and. Their openness comes from the fact that it does not have illusions over the world.
She sees it exact, while it is and says what it sees. Sometimes you can wish that they were not so honest. But on the other hand, it became like each possible other girl, wouldn’t’ its; t it? In all probability you do not like it. A Sagittarius woman is very optimistic, but she is not opposed to common sense. She judges the entire situation as per the fact, analyzed its probable result and believes still that things improve. Normally it is very calm and existed. However if you become impolite to it or it to insult, it can become like the fire brackets counter acting force.

Sagittarius women are quite independent and love their freedom. They are attached to their family, but not too much. If you liked to keep somewhat effected from a Sagittarius woman, simply you asked them; don’ baptize-rise up. She does it never at all. It is your better half and don’t, which you forget dare. On the one hand it doesn’t wish husband or a friend. It must be a real man, that its ego and won’ has; T-location for nonsense. Thus you are expected to balance politeness with firmness.

This is a time of great personal change. You become tired of your role in life, and you are very sensitive to habits, customs, and social requirements that hide the "real you". You feel as though you have been drifting along with the tide and following the crowd for too long, and your inner needs and motivations must assert themselves more strongly. This is a time you could be more distressed than usual over any dissonance in your environment or personal relationships, and you are inclined to avoid serious discussions or real disagreements with others. Also, challenging mental work and concentration is difficult for you now. Take a step back if possible and realize tomorrow will be here soon enough. 

June 7, 2011

Bloggers' Rights, EFF’s Legal Guide!


If you're a blogger, this page is for you.

One of EFF's goals is to give you a basic roadmap to the legal issues you may confront as a blogger, to let you know you have rights, and to encourage you to blog freely with the knowledge that your legitimate speech is protected.

To that end, we have created the Legal Guide for Bloggers, a collection of blogger-specific FAQs addressing everything from fair use to defamation law to workplace whistle-blowing.
In addition, EFF continues to battle for bloggers' rights in the courtroom:

Bloggers can be journalists (and journalists can be bloggers). We're battling for legal and institutional recognition that if you engage in journalism, you're a journalist, with all of the attendant rights, privileges, and protections. (See Apple v. Does.)

Bloggers are entitled to free speech. We're working to shield you from frivolous or abusive threats and lawsuits. Internet bullies shouldn't use copyright, libel, or other claims to chill your legitimate speech. (See OPG v. Diebold.)

Bloggers have the right to political speech. We're working with a number of other public-interest organizations to ensure that the Federal Election Commission (FEC) doesn't gag bloggers' election-related speech. We argue that the FEC should adopt a presumption against the regulation of election-related speech by individuals on the Internet, and interpret the existing media exemption to apply to online media outlets that provide news reporting and commentary regarding an election -- including blogs. (See our joint comments to the FEC [PDF, 332K].)

Bloggers have the right to stay anonymous. We're continuing our battle to protect and preserve your constitutional right to anonymous speech online, including providing a guide to help you with strategies for keeping your identity private when you blog. (See How to Blog Safely (About Work or Anything Else).)

Bloggers have freedom from liability for hosting speech the same way other web hosts do. We're working to strengthen Section 230 liability protections under the Communications Decency Act (CDA) while spreading the word that bloggers are entitled to them. (See Barrett v. Rosenthal.)

If you'd like to spread the word about our work, consider adding an EFF Bloggers' Rights Badge to your blog or website.

May 28, 2011

The Truth: Vietnam Veterans & Agent Orange Exposure!

During the Vietnam War, between 1962 & 1971, the U.S. military sprayed 20,000,000 US gallons of chemical herbicides & defoliants in Vietnam, E. Laos & parts of Cambodia, as part of the aerial defoliation program known as Operation Ranch Hand. The goal was to defoliate rural/forested land, depriving guerrillas of food, cover & clearing in sensitive areas around base perimeters. It was also a part of a general policy of forced draft urbanization, which aimed to destroy the ability of peasants to support themselves in the countryside, forcing them to flee to the U.S. dominated cities, depriving guerrillas of rural support.

Spraying was usually done either from helicopters or from low-flying C-123 Provider aircraft, fitted with sprayers and "MC-1 Hourglass" pump systems and 1,000 US gal (3,800 L) chemical tanks. Spray runs were also conducted from trucks, boats, and backpack sprayers.

The first batch of herbicides was unloaded at Tan Son Nhut Airbase in South Vietnam, on January 9, 1962. Air Force records show at least 6,542 spraying missions took place over the course of Operation Ranch Hand. By 1971, 12 percent of the total area of South Vietnam had been sprayed with defoliating chemicals, which were often applied at rates that were 13 times higher than the legal USDA limit. In South Vietnam alone, an estimated 10 million hectares of agricultural land were ultimately destroyed. In some areas, TCDD concentrations in soil and water were hundreds of times greater than the levels considered safe by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

The campaign destroyed 5 million acres (20,000 km2) of upland and mangrove forests and millions of acres of crops. Overall, more than 20% of South Vietnam's forests were sprayed at least once over a nine year period.

In 1965, members of the U.S. Congress were told "crop destruction is understood to be the more important purpose ... but the emphasis is usually given to the jungle defoliation in public mention of the program." Soldiers were told they were destroying crops because they were going to be used to feed guerrillas. They later discovered nearly all of the food they had been destroying was not being produced for guerrillas; it was, in reality, only being grown to support the local civilian population. For example, in Quang Ngai province, 85% of the crop lands were scheduled to be destroyed in 1970 alone. Widespread famine occurred as a result, leaving hundreds of thousands of people malnourished or starving.

The U.S. military began targeting food crops in October 1962, primarily using Agent Blue; the American public was not made aware of the crop destruction programs until 1965 (and it was then believed that crop spraying had begun that spring). In 1965, 42 percent of all herbicide spraying was dedicated to food crops. The first official acknowledgement of the programs came from the State Department in March 1966.

Many experts at the time, including Arthur Galston, the biologist who developed and intensively studied TCDD, opposed herbicidal warfare, due to concerns about the side effects to humans and the environment by indiscriminately spraying the chemical over a wide area. As early as 1966, resolutions were introduced to the United Nations charging that the U.S. was violating the 1925 Geneva Protocol, which regulated the use of chemical and biological weapons.

Effects on U.S. veterans
Studies of veterans who served in the South during the war have increased rates of cancer, nerve, digestive, skin and respiratory disorders. Veterans from the south had higher rates of throat cancer, acute/chronic leukemia, Hodgkin's lymphoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, prostate cancer, lung cancer, soft tissue sarcoma and liver cancer. Other than liver cancer, these are the same conditions the US Veteran's Administration has found to be associated with exposure to Agent Orange/dioxin, and are on the list of conditions eligible for compensation and treatment.

Military personnel who loaded airplanes and helicopters used in Ranch Hand probably sustained some of the heaviest exposures. Members of the Army Chemical Corps, who stored and mixed herbicides and defoliated the perimeters of military bases, are also thought to have had some of the heaviest exposures. Others with potentially heavy exposures included members of U.S. Army Special Forces units who defoliated remote campsites, and members of U.S. Navy river units who cleared base perimeters. Military members who served on Okinawa also claim to have been exposed to the chemical.

While in Vietnam, the veterans were told not to worry, and were persuaded the chemical was harmless. After returning home, Vietnam veterans began to suspect their ill health or the instances of their wives having miscarriages or children born with birth defects may be related to Agent Orange and the other toxic herbicides to which they were exposed in Vietnam. Veterans began to file claims in 1977 to the Department of Veterans Affairs for disability payments for health care for conditions they believed were associated with exposure to Agent Orange, or more specifically, dioxin, but their claims were denied unless they could prove the condition began when they were in the service or within one year of their discharge.

By April 1993, the Department of Veterans Affairs had only compensated 486 victims, although it had received disability claims from 39,419 soldiers who had been exposed to Agent Orange while serving in Vietnam.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

May 27, 2011

Honor Vietnam Veterans & All Veterans All Year Long!

I would just like to remind everyone this Memorial Day to honor our Vietnam Veterans, those who have left us and those who are still with us. Please take a minute this holiday and remember what they did for us and went through so we can be free today. Most importantly realize Vietnam Veterans are still giving their all every minute of everyday with their health issues that have surfaced within the last ten years due to exposure to Agent Orange in Vietnam during the war. It is only right that we realize this and remember this every minute of everyday and never forget. I have listed a few links to some very good websites with information linking illnesses that our aging Vietnam Veterans are dealing with today back to Agent Orange many years ago. Please go to these sites and get the information and tell your family and friends, someone may be suffering and have not realized it may be from exposure.

US Department of Veterans Affairs
http://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/agentorange/diseases.asp

Agent Orange Legacy
http://agentorangelegacy.com/2011/05/honoring-veterans-all-year-long/

Vietnam Veterans of America
http://www.vva.org/agent_orange.html

Vietnam Now
http://www.vietnow.com/pagesvaret/agent.htm


Thank you and please remember all of our Veterans this Memorial Day.

My Local Weather

Web Analytics